Tuesday, November 3, 2009

The Future of Pharmacy

One of the things I have noticed while surfing through the various pharmacy and pre-pharmacy forums is a frustration with the of changing pre-reqs over the last couple years. The majority seem to think that it is unfair to change requirements and that changes lack an overall point.

Thus I decided to dedicate this blog post to explain precisely why this changing to those who may be unfamiliar with the state of the field. This was spured by a lengthy tangent one of my interviewers and I delved into last week about where the field is heading and the changes that are coming. We both agreed that the current pharmacy school curriculum has to change in the coming years, but no one is quite sure where to start.

Before we dive into that, consider this fact. The classes they teach in medical school have remained relatively unchanged for many years. Sure new topics have been added and new methods of teaching used, but, for example, there hasn't been a new system discovered in the body during this period.

Why is this?

Because medical schools have all the essential information they need to train a doctor today, tomorrow and twenty years from now. Yes there will be some slight variations over the years, but I can guarantee that there will not be a massive change in med school curriculum during that time frame.

Now let's look at pharmacy schools. I consider myself fairly well versed in the history and current events of the field, probably more so than others my age. What few people realize, especially those who are new to pharmacy, is that the field is extremely volatile. There may be no other medical field that is evolving as rapidly as pharmacy is.

Think about how much has changed in the past fifteen years. The number of drugs on the market has exploded. Programs such as MTMs were nothing but the imagination of an innovative few. The term preventive health care was in its infancy.

Yet look where we are today. Pharmacists have never had such a vital role in patient care. The kicker is that this role will continue to increase in the coming years. As pharmacy school's accreditation come due for renewal, many are scrambling to meet the new patient care requirements.

Perhaps the biggest change to come will be the new classes of drugs which are currently in development. It has become apparent that the field has tapped out the available simple chemical compounds that have been the foundation of pharmacy since its inception. It is very unlikely that a new collection of blockbuster drugs will be found under these methods. Granted there is always the possibility, but one will not see blockbuster drugs appear with the frequency that they did at the turn of the century.

Where the future lies, however, are in proteins. Already researchers are toying with the idea of creating unique proteins to act in the same manner as drugs in the body. The evolution of insulin over the past several years is what has opened the door for this new area. Some estimates state that we are less than ten years away from the first protein-based drug hitting the market.

Now lets go back to the schools and their curriculum again. They now have to start adding patient care classes, if they haven't already, and at some point in the future they will have to consider those aforementioned protein based drugs.

The problem is, you simply cannot add more time to the pharmacy school curriculum. Three years in a classroom is the most they will have to work with. In order to squeeze in new classes, to fulfill future requirements, more pre-reqs are going to be required.

In reality, this is not a terrible idea. The first year of many programs are just review of courses that most have already taken. Freeing up credits by making biochemistry and stats pre-reqs is simply a good idea.

Yet another area that will be changing, I would expect by the end of the next decade, is the requirement of some sort of residency program. The field is growing to the point where there is almost too many details for one person to retain in their heads. Pharmacy will most likely take a chapter out of the medical school curriculum and pushing for residency training.

And really, would this be such a bad thing? A pharmacist focused in say, pediatric oncology, working with a doctor with a similar focus could accomplish amazing things together. Sure, people will still go to retail, but how nice would it be to have a retail pharmacy who specialized in diabetes or something of that nature?

To often I work with pharmacists who mumble, or yell depending on their mood, "This is not what I went to pharmacy school for!"

Ya know what, they are right. Yet it all comes back to how quickly the field is evolving and how we must all be prepared to adapt to it in the coming years.

I cringe every time I hear of people jumping into pharmacy without truly knowing what it is all about. Last week one of the interviewees stated that he decided to go to pharmacy school just a month ago and hadn't looked much into it. That alone scared the bejesus out of me.

So those of you who are aspiring to become a pharmacy, heed this message. Your role as a pharmacist in twenty years may be something that no one has imagined yet. This is not even including the Armageddon which is coming with both PBMs (well all know the shit will hit the fan sometime in the next few years) and/or public health care.

Just don't be caught off guard by it.

8 comments:

bash:~$ said...

I'm just now finishing up a semester of Biochemistry in my undergrad, so this post is intriguing to me. I'd love to hear more about proteins being used to develop future medicines.

How did you come to know some much about the pharmaceutical field?

JH said...

Good post! ASHP actually recently published some guidelines that by 2020 all graduating pharmacists who practice patient care will have to undergo residency training. (Remember, these a just guidelines, but ASHP's recommendations are pretty highly regarded.) The only problem right now is that these positions are VERY competitive. I believe that right now there are only about 2,000 residency positions in the country. Hopefully health systems will recognize the value of clinical pharmacists and invest to create more residency programs.

If you want to do a residency, or even want to have the option on the plate, I would suggest getting involved in professional organizations right away in your first year and work on your CV as you go. They are also a good way to promote the growth of the pharmacy profession.

Phathead said...

bash - I can't delve into details regarding proteins because I honestly don't many details behind it. I do know that we are only a few years away from protein drugs which are tailored to individual patients.

As for my industry knowledge, I've been working in pharmacy for almost eight and a half years now. During that time I have completely engrossed myself in the field sucking up as much knowledge as I can. Doesn't hurt that I've been pretty much working full time during that period too lol

Megan Santas said...

I also have heard people say they had zero pharmacy experience before their pharmacy rotations. Not surprisingly, a few of these were people who had finished pharmacy school and immediately decided to do something else with their lives, or stayed and pretty much hated life because they did not like their job.
Note: this refers mainly to retail pharmacists I've worked with, as I personally have no hospital pharmacy experience and hope that the situation is different.

Learning the PharmD Trade said...

As a student now I can say that the changes for pre-reqs are good. There is to much information to learn in three years. It is better to have four years of pre-reqs and then concentrate on pharmacy from the get go in pharmacy school. This is now a doctoral program, eight years is ok.
The field is getting so expansive, between having to know disease states as well as drugs to the actual drugs. This makes it even more interesting in consultation practicing. It is more of a diagnostic session also.
As for all the changes people complain about those changes, they are occurring to those of us in school now too. Also the residency idea is good, the problem is there are so few to the growing number of pharmacy grads.
With everything though, it is a good direction to go. We need to do more than check pill counts and scripts. We can help the patient, but we also need to find a way to get paid to do it.

Pharmer Jones said...

If your applications essays were half as well written as this post is, I bet you'll be seeing an acceptance letter this year.

Anyway, very well said. It's sometimes a bit scary how quickly our field is evolving, but that's also one of the reasons I love it.

Phathead said...

Actually I used this in my essays and my interviews and have already been pretty much rejected from one school.

Anonymous said...

Sir,

Perhaps the reason why you've been rejected after using your opinions regarding future pharmaceutics in your essays was because they are fallacious. Have you ever taken a pharmacology course? I'm sorry but what you wrote in your blog is pretty wrong.