One of the quirks that is never covered in the schools or pamphlets, it is something that I covered earlier this year simply to open other's eyes.
A story mentioned in passing to me earlier today brought an interesting question as a possible response to this unpleasant facet of our profession.
NORTH HIGHLANDS, Calif. -- A shootout in the Sacramento suburbs has left a pharmacy worker dead and police hunting for two drugstore robbers.
Sacramento County Sheriff's Department spokesman Sgt. Tim Curran says two men walked into a Rexall pharmacy Thursday afternoon and demanded drugs.
Curran said the robbers and an armed employee began firing at each other in the store in a chaotic gun battle that continued into the parking lot. He said investigators are still trying to sort out who fired first.
The sheriff's department says a 27-year-old pharmacy employee died after being shot in the chest. Curran says a 37-year-old employee who was eight months pregnant was shot in the foot.
The employee involved in the shooting was not injured.
Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090305519.html
The initial thought may be to applaud the pharmacy worker for not taking the situation lying down... until you considered the lives lost.
After discussing the article, naturally the debate evolved to questioning the validity of a conceal and carry permit being employed in a pharmacy for protection.
Here I shall offer a bit of a disclaimer: I have no problem with the second amendment and all the rights it bestows. If the Constitution said that it was okay for people to walk around wearing chicken suits and flinging shit at each other, I would accept it and move on with my life.
This isn't intended to be a public service announcement.
Now some of the statements made alluded to the fact that it is too bad more places do not allow such permits to be invoked while working in a pharmacy. Obviously the logic being that the profession could be dangerous at times and we should have a chance to protect ourselves.
My initial logic is a resounding no.
First off, we are deemed professionals by the schools we intended, our peers and even by the government. We do not cover a course studying Rambo in our schooling. Additionally we have a duty to protect our patients and, I would think, a situation like this would fall under that oath. And I do not think putting their lives in harm's way anymore than they already are is a wise idea.
Second, pharmacies are usually a fairly small and confined areas. The person in question is probably already nervous and is most likely bluffing (even the most whacked out of methhead's are going to realize it will be difficult to get away with shooting someone in a public pharmacy).
By threatening back you are effectively kicking the situation up a notch and perhaps making said person panic. The vast majority of the time I hear of shootings in a pharmacy, it is due to someone trying to be a hero and antagonizing the situation.
Plus there is also the risk of giving said person the option of yet another weapon if things go even more wrong.
I've been in this situation. It's not fun and it's more stressful than most of you can imagine. With adrenalin running, you do jump into survival mode and almost run on autopilot.
I completely get the part.
What I don't get is the logic behind going this route. A woman... no, a co-worker is dead and another pregnant co-worker is injured because someone decided to fight back and one could argue that part of the reason for this is the actions of the co-worker. You have no idea if the criminal in question is merely pushing buttons or if they actually have the ability to take a life. Surprisingly, most do not have the power to do so unless pushed.
Plus, it's one thing if it's just you and the criminal, but it is another thing when you are endangering those around you.
My question is if there are any other thoughts about this? I may have completely missed the point on this or I could be completely in the right.
I honestly don't know.




